So is Apple thrive? Honestly? Who knows? I have no doubt that the Apple (AAPL) has been thinking about the watch. And I have little doubt that they even play around with the concept and put some people in here as a test project. Now, according to my colleagues at Bloomberg News Peter Burrows and Adam Satariano, Apple is putting out about 100 people on the project, which may indicate something more serious than a joy. But Apple is not afraid to pull the plug on it, so the future of this product still speculative.Do want to speculate, then? Sure! I mean, I can understand the idea behind the iWatch. In some ways, I can understand more easily than I could Google Glass Project. While taking augmented-reality view of the world is pretty cool T-800 kind of way, you still have to wear glasses. Now, I wear glasses, but not everyone may feel the same witness sluggish adoption of 3D TV, which also requires Eyewear. Watching A, on the other hand, is quiet. Anyone can wear watch.Do wear a watch? Of course not. I carry my iPhone with everywhere.What you think watching from Apple do? More speculation, please.Well, I think the first thing to do is to work together with the iPhone. An iWatch (let's call it that for now), you will need to have excellent battery life, making it standalone computing device does not make sense. It would consume too much power. But as something that has the look and some of the basic inputs and connects wirelessly via Bluetooth to the phone where the real heavy lifting is achieved? That might make it more energy efficient display accessories iPhone.Would in view? I believe it. Given the characteristics of low power technology like AMOLED (Active-Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode for, for those playing along at home) you can create a touchscreen measuring pulse. If you have left a touch, and I do not think Apple, you can go to Route E-Paper (think Amazon (AMZN) lit), which uses much less power. This is the approach taken by the Pebble, independent makers of a Bluetooth-enabled wristwatch that links to your smartphone and display relevant information.But I will be able to make phone calls on it, like Dick, I'm going to cut you off there, if you do not objections. I put a moratorium on references to some yellow-trenchcoated detectives came to the wrist-borne communications device. That said, I do not always think to iWatch or even should have phone capabilities. In a fantasy world I created, iWatch only works in concert with the iPhone. Your phone is a great device to make a call, end to your ear, the other from your mouth. There's even a headphone with a built-in mic for hands-free calling. Why do you want to talk to your wrist? So what he did, if not make a call? Can do many things. With display, iWatch can easily remind you of upcoming appointments or to do items with a tone or vibration. Read incoming text, e-mail, and other messages from your wrist. You can also display turn-by-turn navigation cues, "three blocks" Think of subway stairs into the flow of vehicles on the road, and you hold your wrist to see the arrow pointing to the left, say, as I do not think the function iWatch as a phone, I can see it working with Siri. Holding your wrist to tell Siri to schedule lunch with your friends for tomorrow at 1 makes more sense than holding a full conversation on the phone with iWatch watch.The You can also become quite a competitor in the wearable fitness devices, such as Up jaw , (NKE) Nike FuelBand, Fitbit and Flex. All devices are currently working on an iPhone to collect and analyze data. What if Apple has developed its own service? After all, Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, is a noted fitness fanatic.Isn not Tim Cook on the board of directors of Nike? He believes, that will make things a bit difficult if Apple comes with a device that directly compete with Nike makes.Kind something reminds me of how Eric Schmidt will leave the board when Apple started Android.Bingo.How Google develops we know it did not go the calculator watch? We do not. But why are you holding a calculator watch as a pattern of failure? Since the watch can only say City.That time ticks cruel. True, but harsh. You're right that a multifunction watches checkered past: From the legendary Casio (6952) Databank series Seiko (6724) 's TV viewing positively mad at Microsoft (MSFT) turned out to watch the spot, had many failed attempts to put more than one hours on our wrist. Apple is to succeed where others do not? I can not speculate away.
No comments:
Post a Comment